<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:at="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/at"
    xmlns:icbm="http://postneo.com/icbm"
    xmlns:rvw="http://purl.org/NET/RVW/0.2/"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss">
    <channel>
        <title>Smiley&#39;s Tropical Escape</title>
        <link>http://smiley.vox.com/library/posts/tags/flickr+video/page/1/</link>
        <description>Sad Songs on a Broken Ukelele</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <generator>Vox</generator>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:18:52 +0900</lastBuildDate>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
        <category domain="http://smiley.vox.com/tags/">flickr video</category>  
 
        <item>
            <title>Technology QotW: Video Killed the Photography Star</title>
            <link>http://smiley.vox.com/library/post/technology-qotw-video-killed-the-photography-star.html?_c=feed-rss-full</link>   
            <author>nobody@vox.com(Smiley)</author>
            <comments>http://smiley.vox.com/library/post/technology-qotw-video-killed-the-photography-star.html?_c=feed-rss-full</comments>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://smiley.vox.com/library/post/technology-qotw-video-killed-the-photography-star.html?_c=feed-rss-full</guid> 
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 11:18:52 +0900</pubDate>         
            
            <description>    &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Flickr pro users can now upload 90 second videos which has members complaining about everything from slowing Flickr down, lack of community consultation, and diminishing Flickr&amp;#39;s inital purpose: photography. What do you think -- Do you support video on Flickr? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a good question.&amp;#160; I&amp;#39;ve been browsing around the video and I like some of the stuff I&amp;#39;ve seen, but I think Flickr would have been better off making a sister site with lots of interaction and cross applications.&amp;#160; Something like the way the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43things.com/&quot;&gt;43 Things&lt;/a&gt; group of websites works - they&amp;#39;re all separate, but they cross-link and work together fairly well.&amp;#160; Having said that, they&amp;#39;ve done it, and done it fairly well and all that&amp;#39;s left to be done is to wait and see how the hardcore Flickr users adapt and change the service offered.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt; 
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://smiley.vox.com/library/post/technology-qotw-video-killed-the-photography-star.html?_c=feed-rss-full#comments&quot;&gt;Read and post comments&lt;/a&gt;   |   
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vox.com/share/6a00c2251e70a18e1d00f48d15de7a0001?_c=feed-rss-full&quot;&gt;Send to a friend&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
 
            </description> 
            <category domain="http://smiley.vox.com/tags/">qotd</category> 
            <category domain="http://smiley.vox.com/tags/">flickr video</category>   
        </item> 
    </channel>
</rss>

